The Practical Parson

They forced your businesses to close; but we have no kings. They forced you to stay home; but we have no kings. They forced you to mask; but we have no kings. They forced on you the so-called vaccine; but we have no kings. They forced on you social distancing; but we have no kings. They forced on you quarantine; but we have no kings. They forced your children out of school; but we have no kings. They forced you to sit by while radicals burned their cities; but we have no kings. They forced you to sit by while they arrested anyone not staying home; but we have no kings. They forced the elderly and infirm to die alone without family; but we have no kings. They forced the closure of houses of worship; but we have no kings. They forced the banning of family gatherings; but we have no kings. They forced clergy to stay out of hospitals comforting the sick; but we have no kings. They forced families to stay away from their departed loved ones; but we have no kings. They forced the closure of ...

 Ever since the Enlightenment period of history, purportedly educated men and women have long been on a crusade to break mankind of its religion and faith in those things that are unseen.  We see it in every facet of life around us, the struggle to break mankind of its ability to believe in something that is not of itself; something greater.  The intellectuals try to break us of our faith by telling us that there is no possible way to prove that the things contained in scripture actually happened; though they fail to acknowledge that they themselves cannot prove that they did NOT happen.  They tell us that we should not submit to blind faith, and should always and only trust our own senses; for there lies our freedom from faith and religion.  Perhaps most intriguingly, is the fact that though the liberal intellectual community has pushed this doctrinal concept of "only believe your senses" for generations, the reality of it is actually quite the reverse.  ...

  As most people in the States are aware, the District Attorney of Manhattan, NY has been pursuing an investigation into former President Donald Trump's relationship and subsequent clashes with a woman who claims to have had an intimate relationship with him years ago.  The facts of the matter seem fairly clear and clean-cut: Trump had an affair with a porn star, got her to agree to a non-disclosure agreement, then when he ran for president his attorney arranged a payment to the woman to help maintain her agreement to silence.  Now at face value this may seem like a damning situation, and one that the attorney general of Manhattan is banking on people thinking so; but what is the legal basis of seeking prosecution against the man?  The entire search for prosecution hinges on a vague (and as the NY Times itself refers to it as) legal "theory", that one of Trump's former attorneys arranging such a payment was an violation of campaign finance laws.  Not that paying...